- About us
- Join Putnam
The drug development pipeline has evolved from primary care to specialty and now advances deeper into exquisitely targeted therapies for shrinking niches of addressable populations. In parallel, governments and private payers continue to struggle with appropriately rewarding innovation while managing healthcare budgets in the face of aging populations.
The pressure then on biopharma companies is now, more than ever, to ensure their assets are targeting the right markets with the right story, key messages, and pricing.
Launch planning and execution, whether for novel products or indication expansion, is a critical focus area for commercial teams. Many have dedicated business units and strategic relationships with partner organizations that deliver specialist resources, capabilities, and skill sets to ensure successful commercialization and that their product’s value is realized. Market access has become one of the most important enablers of commercial success.
Given these trends and pressures, our value, pricing, and access practice is increasingly supporting clients in four critical areas:
1. Innovating evidence development approaches
Much of today’s innovative drug development pipeline does not conform readily to traditional value assessment approaches. For example,
Our clients are increasingly challenged to re-imagine and generate stakeholder buy-in to novel evidence development approaches, spanning the needs of both regulatory agencies and market access stakeholders. Innovations that we support include identifying novel trial endpoints and trial designs, greater incorporation of quality of life and patient reported outcomes, and novel use of real-world data and technology into evidence programs. The investment in evidence development both starts earlier and continues longer (post-marketing) to support and retain access and favorable pricing.
2. Leveraging the increasing availability and acceptance of real-world data (RWD) sources pre-and-post launch
When planning for commercialization, life science companies need to align the value generation activities, including product positioning and evidence generation, to maximize pricing opportunities. This has become highly nuanced as more personalized therapies enter the pipeline.
A key objective of HTA bodies and payers when assessing new medicines and negotiating pricing and access is to determine not only the potential value of the medicine based upon trial results but the likely value in the real-world setting. RWD is being leveraged to both substantiate therapeutic benefit in real-world usage settings, as well as to develop the evidence base to support initial HTA and payer discussions. As it becomes increasingly difficult for pivotal clinical trials in oncology and rare diseases to conduct comparisons with an appropriate comparator – or, indeed, any comparator at all – RWD is used alongside powerful statistical methods to construct a synthetic control arm to allow a comparison with a relevant comparator. In addition, RWD is increasingly used to provide support for the burden of disease that is addressed, justify comparators for HTA and access discussions, provide data inputs for economic models, and establish the natural history of disease. RWD is also increasingly used, often alongside data from clinical trials, to develop predictive algorithms that help to improve diagnostic outcomes or identify patients more likely to succeed on particular treatments.
RWD programs can leverage existing data infrastructure, e.g., claims and EHR databases, with data and analytics vendors growing more sophisticated in stitching together data sets to power greater insights. Additionally, heavier investments are being made to generate new and better sources of RWD, e.g., patient registries in rare diseases, and sophisticated infectious disease monitoring programs to support burden of disease substantiation for vaccine recommendations.
3. Developing novel contracting and tender approaches
Biopharma clients are pressed to meet the needs of a wide array of budget holders across markets with differing budgetary constraints and cost-control tools at their disposal. Budget holders also have differing negotiation leverage depending upon a variety of factors including the criticality of the unmet need, pressures from external stakeholders, and the competitive therapeutic environment. Navigating these complexities to balance the needs of stakeholders – appropriate patient access, budget-holder affordability, and biopharma competitive position and profitability – is extremely challenging, requiring both local strategies and substantial global coordination as price transparency and international reference pricing initiatives expand around the world. Contracting and tendering considerations include such approaches as simple discounts and rebates, value- and outcomes- based and other innovative agreement structures, performance-based approaches, portfolio approaches, payment over time, and in some cases may also include ancillary considerations such as localized manufacturing or value-added services.
4. Effectively addressing patient out-of-pocket costs and gaps in access
Patient out-of-pocket costs have become a critical access hurdle, not just for patients in the US but across an increasing number of developed and developing markets. In addition, some payers are increasingly pushing back on biopharma approaches to out-of-pocket cost mitigation. Our clients are challenged to innovate their approaches to drive patient affordability while balancing gross-to-net considerations.
In addition, gaps in access (e.g., uninsured patients, or critical need patients in markets without reimbursement) are a heightened challenge for advanced and targeted therapeutics, where high therapy costs, one-time use (in some cases), and limited addressable populations are all factors that make it more difficult for biopharma companies to make alternative access and patient assistance programs broadly available.
Optimizing market access strategy
Understanding the evolving market access environment from the early stages of product development is essential for informing evidence development, pricing, and access strategies.
Looking ahead, we anticipate a continuation of these four trends and ongoing pressure to innovate value substantiation and access stakeholder engagement strategies on pace with biopharma’s clinical innovation.
We continue to invest in our teams’ expert capabilities, tools, and scale to help our clients develop pricing, contracting, and access strategies that support growth and maximize value.
Learn how we can help you create more effective market access strategies that deliver successful product launch results.
We set out to understand the likelihood of regulatory approval of oncology-based single-arm trials by the European Medical Agency (EMA).
As provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 begin to take effect, Putnam continues to analyze the implications…
Supporting and empowering patients are objectives stated by nearly every life science company. Yet efforts to support patient engagement often...